ISLAMABAD: The attorney of PTI chief Imran Khan has challenged the appointment of an anti-terrorism courtroom judge as presiding officer of the exclusive court for cipher circumstance demo in jail under the Formal Techniques Act, just before a division bench of the Islamabad Higher Court.
Barrister Salman Akram Raja argued ahead of the IHC bench comprising Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb and Justice Arbab Mohammad Tahir that the appointment of Judge Abual Hasnat Zulqarnain was ‘unconstitutional’, simply because the regulation ministry notified it without having prior consultation with the IHC main justice.
This ‘anomaly’ was pointed out when the division bench started hearing an intra-courtroom attraction of the PTI chairman against the choice of the IHC chief justice that experienced validated each the appointment as well as Mr Khan’s jail trial.
Party’s core committee alleges chairman is remaining ‘slow poisoned’ in prison
Barrister Salman Akram stated the legislation ministry was not authorised to pick out a judge, as their nomination was only a prerogative of the chief justice of a significant court docket.
When Justice Aurangzeb observed that this level was not lifted earlier prior to a one bench, Barrister Salman argued that an software against the appointment had been submitted in advance of a one bench but it was dismissed.
To corroborate his argument concerning the appointment, the PTI chairman’s law firm pointed out that even the tenure of an accountability decide, Mohammad Bashir, was extended with the consent of the higher court.
Following hearing the initial argument of the defence attorney, the court issued a see to the legislation ministry with a course to depute the officer not considerably less than the quality of a joint secretary for support in the matter.
More listening to has been adjourned until Thursday.
Witness testimony deferred
Also on Tuesday, the unique court deferred recording of statement of prosecution witnesses who had taken care of the ‘cipher’ in the overseas ministry and PM Office.
The cipher controversy hit headlines for the to start with time when former primary minister Imran Khan in a general public tackle alleged that a diplomatic cipher was a proof of the alleged conspiracy behind the toppling of the PTI government.
10 witnesses including Imran Sajjad, Aqeel Haider, Shamoon Qaiser, M. Afzal, Nadir Khan, Iqra Ashraf, Farrukh Abbas, Haseeb bin Aziz, Shabbir and Khushnood appeared right before the court all through the jail trial.
In the meantime, the same court docket allowed the defence attorney to browse the ‘confidential’ proof and fulfill detained PTI leaders Imran Khan and Shah Mehmood Qureshi for discussion just before the start of official proceedings. The court docket adjourned the listening to until Nov 7.
On the other hand, PTI’s media wing issued a statement reiterating the claim that Imran Khan was staying ‘slow poisoned’ in jail.
The occasion claimed it known as an unexpected emergency conference of the core committee to discuss the problem of Mr Khan remaining subjected to gradual poisoning and declared that the committee would focus on the info shared by Mr Khan with his legal crew and a thorough handout would be issued quickly.
PTI spokesperson Raoof Hasan confirmed to Dawn that a core committee meeting was held on Tuesday.
In accordance to the get together, the assembly was held about Zoom, but it was made the decision not to share any information with the media for the time remaining.
Later on, the occasion shared information on social media and posted a statement on X (previously Twitter).
Mr Khan’s spouse, Bushra Bibi, and his lawyers have expressed worries in the previous that he could be gradual poisoned through foods in jail, urging the court docket to allow him the facility to have home made foods.
Very similar apprehensions about the poisoning of PML-N supremo Nawaz Sharif in jail had surfaced underneath the PTI routine.
Posted in Dawn, November 1st, 2023